Performance Analysis
Plant and turbine level yield gap analysis, PR / CUF / PLF benchmarking, and energy loss waterfall attribution — every lost kWh assigned to a cause.
Data first · Then intelligence
Most portfolios lose 1–2% of yield to problems nobody can see — because the data is fragmented.
Data sits in OEM portals, spreadsheets and email. Monthly MIS is assembled by hand. Answering “why” needs a phone call to site.
Digitalisation fails when it starts with a tool. It works when it starts with an honest read of data maturity. A dashboard built on unreconciled data only industrialises the disagreement.
A platform is procured. Six months on it shows numbers nobody trusts — because tag mapping, availability definitions and the loss taxonomy were never agreed first.
Maturity is assumed rather than assessed. Vendors sell the destination; nobody sizes the distance between here and there.
Diagnose first. Fix the data contract, the definitions and the reconciliation. Then layer intelligence on a foundation that holds under challenge.
A structured analytics and decision framework built on real-world execution. Each tier maps to a maturity stage — you enter where you actually are, and commit only to the step that is next.
SCADA and CMMS integration, a governed data model, an agreed loss taxonomy and automated management reporting — including the DGR pipeline that replaces the manual sheet.
Moves you to Stage 02 — Consolidated
Continuous monitoring, automated deviation detection routed to a named owner, an executive KPI layer, and independent availability recomputation for LTSA assurance.
Moves you to Stage 03 — Intelligent
Predictive degradation and failure models, prescriptive O&M, and anomaly detection with automated ticketing that raises against the underlying cause — not the symptom.
Moves you to Stage 04 — Predictive
Every engagement begins with a diagnostic — a 30–45 day read across a representative slice of the portfolio that establishes the baseline, the loss taxonomy and the roadmap before any build commitment is made.
From plant-level performance analysis to enterprise intelligence architecture — and the advisory layer that makes it hold up in front of a board.
Plant and turbine level yield gap analysis, PR / CUF / PLF benchmarking, and energy loss waterfall attribution — every lost kWh assigned to a cause.
Preventive and corrective maintenance modules, contractor performance audit, spares and inventory digitalisation, and response-time analytics.
MIS ecosystem design, SCADA and CMMS integration, governed data models with an agreed loss taxonomy, and automated management reporting.
Production-grade executive and operational dashboards on a single governed model, so two teams stop quoting two different numbers.
Forecast deviation engines, sensor anomaly detection, and predictive degradation modelling with automated root-cause ticketing.
Independent availability recomputation, LTSA and OEM assurance, feasibility and due diligence, and investor- and lender-ready reporting.
Each of these was found in data the operator already had. No new instrumentation, and no site visit needed to make the first call.
Wind · 01
A systematic cluster below the OEM power curve — 15–25% output gap at the same wind speed, worth ₹45–60L per turbine per year.
Read the caseWind · 02
The turbine's own output validates the sensor. Detect, grade by severity, identify direction, correct — without masking real underperformance.
Read the caseWind · 03
Several SCADA schemas, several availability definitions. One tag dictionary makes every platform comparable — and the OEM conversation evidence-based.
Read the caseSolar · 01
Plant-level PR hides everything. One block in the bottom band every day is a physical fault; one that moves in and out is a data problem.
Read the caseSolar · 02
The measured soiling rate — not an assumed one — sets the economic cycle. 0.8–1.5% recoverable PR, roughly 1.2 MU/yr on a 50 MW plant.
Read the caseSolar · 03
PR is a ratio. Drift the denominator and you manufacture a problem that isn't there — or hide one that is.
Read the caseDetection outcomes and ranges are indicative, drawn from Divinergy DART cases and illustrative machine classes — not from any single client's data. Actual recovery varies with wind regime, dust load, rainfall pattern, tariff and turbine rating.
Everyone offers module-level testing. What matters is what happens after the test — raw output turned into inverter-level corrective guidance with a financial consequence attached.
In-situ EL imaging runs at night with zero generation loss — no strings shut down for diagnostics.
Four field and workflow systems built for Indian wind OEM and IPP operations. All four are configurable rather than bespoke — which is why deployment is measured in weeks, not quarters.
The manual Excel daily generation report, replaced by an automated SCADA-to-warehouse pipeline — with validation that strips duplicate and corrupt records before they ever reach reporting.
Why it matters: the DGR is the number everyone argues about. Automate it and the argument moves from the data to the decision.
Checklist-driven O&M in the field. Asset hierarchy from state down to individual equipment, PM calendars, inspection checklists and breakdown capture — offline-first, because remote sites lose signal.
Pairs with analytics: a ticket raised by anomaly detection can open the PM task automatically.
Controlled access to hazardous work, with configurable permit types for electrical, hot work and confined space — and a multi-step approval engine that captures data at every stage.
Outcome: a complete compliance trail, and reduced safety risk on every job.
Digital commissioning checklists per turbine, multi-level approval, and a quality history card per unit — with live plan-versus-actual so readiness is a number, not an opinion.
Measured result: a 15% reduction in readiness time in production use.
Built and deployed with Divinergy's engineering delivery partner. Every system is configured to the operator's own hierarchy, permit types and reporting formats. Client references available on request.
A specialist consultancy at the intersection of renewable operations and digital innovation — born from hands-on years inside India's leading IPPs.
Control rooms run, O&M contractors managed, availability disputes argued and settled. Every framework is calibrated for how Indian RE assets actually behave.
No OEM, EPC or platform vendor relationships to protect. When the analysis says the turbine supplier is wrong, that is what the report says.
We start where the real problem is — tag mapping, definitions, reconciliation. AI-readiness is the outcome of getting that right, not the opening line of a pitch.
Yield uplift in MU, recovery in Cr, payback in months. A finding without a financial consequence is an observation, and observations don't get funded.
Four field systems already in production and configurable rather than bespoke. Diagnostics land in 30–45 days.
Ranges are stated as ranges. Illustrative figures are labelled illustrative. Limitations go in the deck rather than waiting to be discovered.
Whether the next step is a diagnostic, a data foundation or a full intelligence layer — Divinergy is ready to engage. We start by listening.